THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CLT IN THE ESL CONTEXT OF PAKISTAN

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glr.2016(I-I).08      10.31703/glr.2016(I-I).08      Published : Mar 2016
Authored by : ArshadAliKhan , HussainAhmad , Sayyed RashidAliShah

08 Pages : 85-111

References

  • Ahmed, S., & Rao, C. (2013). Applying Communicative Approach in teaching English as a Foreign Language: A Case study of Pakistan. Porta Linguarum, 187-203. Retrieved November 2016
  • Ahn, H. (2012) Teaching Writing Skills Based on a Genre Approach to L2 Primary School Students: An Action Research. Canadian Centre of Science and Education. 5(2), 2-16. Retrieved From
  • Atkinson, D. (2003). L2 Writing in the Post-Process Era: Introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 3-15. Retrieved from
  • Beretta, A., & Davies, A. (1985). Evaluation of the Bangalore Project. ELT Journal, 39(2), 121-129. Retrieved August 6, 2016
  • Canale, M., & Swaine , M. (1980). Theoretical bases of Communicative Approaches to Secong Language Teaching and Testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47. Retrieved October 26, 2016
  • Cheng, F. W. (2008). Scaffolding Language, Scaffolding Writing: A Genre Approach to Teaching Narrative Writing. Asian EFL Journal, 10(2). Retrieved from
  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1989). Narrative and story in practice and research.
  • Ellis, G. (1996). How Culturally Appropriate is the Communicative Approach? ELT Journal, 50(3), 213-218. Retrieved October 26, 2016
  • Hyland, K. (2002). Specificity Revisited: how far should we go now? English for Specific Purposes. 21, 385-395. Retrieved from
  • Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17-29.
  • Hyland, K. (2007). Genre Pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 148-164. Retrieved from
  • Lee, M. W. (2014). Will Ccommunicative Language Teaching work? Teachers' Perceptions towards the new Educational reform in South Korea. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 1-17. Retrieved August 9, 2016
  • Savignon, S. J. (1991). Communicative Language Teaching: State of the Art. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 261 - 279. Retrieved August 1, 2016, from
  • Sun, G., & Cheng, L. (2002). From Context to Curriculum: A Case Study of Communicative Langage teaching in China. TESL Canada Journal, 19(2). Retrieved August 10, 2016
  • Swain, M. (1988). Manupilating and Complementing Content Teaching to Maximize Second Language Learning. TESL Canada Journal, 6(1), 68- 84. Retrieved July 10, 2016
  • Temple, C. A., & Gillet, J. W. (1989). Language Arts: Learning Processes and Training Practics. Pearson Scott Foresman.

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Khan, Arshad Ali, Hussain Ahmad, and Sayyed Rashid Ali Shah. 2016. "The Effectiveness of CLT in the ESL Context of Pakistan." Global Language Review, I (I): 85-111 doi: 10.31703/glr.2016(I-I).08
    HARVARD : KHAN, A. A., AHMAD, H. & SHAH, S. R. A. 2016. The Effectiveness of CLT in the ESL Context of Pakistan. Global Language Review, I, 85-111.
    MHRA : Khan, Arshad Ali, Hussain Ahmad, and Sayyed Rashid Ali Shah. 2016. "The Effectiveness of CLT in the ESL Context of Pakistan." Global Language Review, I: 85-111
    MLA : Khan, Arshad Ali, Hussain Ahmad, and Sayyed Rashid Ali Shah. "The Effectiveness of CLT in the ESL Context of Pakistan." Global Language Review, I.I (2016): 85-111 Print.
    OXFORD : Khan, Arshad Ali, Ahmad, Hussain, and Shah, Sayyed Rashid Ali (2016), "The Effectiveness of CLT in the ESL Context of Pakistan", Global Language Review, I (I), 85-111
    TURABIAN : Khan, Arshad Ali, Hussain Ahmad, and Sayyed Rashid Ali Shah. "The Effectiveness of CLT in the ESL Context of Pakistan." Global Language Review I, no. I (2016): 85-111. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2016(I-I).08