References

• Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Demuth, K., Machobane, M., & Moloi, F. (2009). Learning how to license null noun-class prefixes in Sesotho. Language, 85(4), 864-883.
• Hyams, N. (1986). Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.
• Hyland, K. (2009) Academic Discourse. London: Continuum
• Kim, S. Y. (2007). Topics and null arguments in Korean: The syntax and discourse. In Proceedings of Workshop in General Linguistics 2006 (63-76).
• Macdonald, O. K. (2016). A comparative syntactic review of null-subject parameter in English and Ịzọn languages. Journal of Languages and Culture, 7(8), 79-85.
• Radford, A. (2004). English Syntax: An Introduction. United Kingdom: Cambridge Univerity Press.
• Radford, A. (2009). An Introduction to English Sentence Structure. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
• Rizzi, L. (1986). On Chain Formation in the Syntax of Pronominal Clitics. Syntax and Semantics, 19, 65-95.
• Rosselló, J. (2000). A minimalist approach to the null subject parameter. Catalan working papers in linguistics, 8, 097-128.
• Saleem, M. (2018). Syntactic Analysis of Classroom Discourse: A Minimalist Perspective (Unpublished M.Phil thesis). Air University Islamabad, Pakistan.
• Saleem, M., Khan, F. A., & Zaman, A. (2018). Wh-Movement Pattern in the Spoken Discourse of Teachers A Syntactic Analysis. Global Social Sciences Review, III(II), 400-420.
• Schwenter, S. A., & Silva, G. (2002). Overt vs. null direct objects in spoken Brazilian Portuguese: A semantic/pragmatic account. Hispania, 577-586.
• Soriano, O. F. (1989). Strong pronouns in null-subject languages and the Avoid Pronoun Principle. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 11, 228-239.
• Zanuttini, R., Pak, M., & Portner, P. (2012). A syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on imperative, promissive, and exhortative subjects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 30(4), 1231-1274.