Abstract

This analytical study was conducted through a mixed method approach and a test, related to present tenses’ active and passive was taken, from the BS students. Through open ended questionnaires, their experiences and problems faced in the learning of present tenses were taken. The analysis of students' errors was conducted using Corder's (1981) conceptual framework, and test results were calculated and analyzed using Dulay, Burt, and Krashen's (1982) surface structure taxonomy, which reflect that students still face issues in their writings skills and make errors related to present tenses as statistical analysis of present tenses’ test manifests that students make errors of omission and misinformation related to lexical and auxiliary verbs, subjects, pronouns, subject verb agreement etc. The percentage of errors of addition and disordering was not high as compared to other errors (omission and misinformation) and the causes of such intralingual errors were ignorance of rules restriction and false concept hypothesis.

Key Words

Errors, Present Tense, Surface Structure Taxonomy, Intralingua

Introduction

Writing is an important medium to communicate with people. To understand properly another language’s linguistic system, grammar is the important area that cannot be neglected and it includes tenses and parts of speech. 

       According to Baker in (Jabbary, 2013), tense is a grammatical category that involves changing the form of the verb to reflect the location of an event in time. The traditional distinction is between the past, present, and future. Every language is capable of expressing events that occur at different times. Students regard tenses as one of the more difficult materials to learn when studying grammar. If students do not understand tenses of English language, then it would be difficult for them to advance their English to the upper level. 

         According to the writer's experience, students frequently make mistakes with verb tense and time signal usage. Students frequently do not understand when the verb form will be used, whether in the past or in the future. If students do not understand the tense correctly, they may misuse the language. It does, in fact, lead to misunderstandings in communication. As a result, an error analysis is required to correct the error. 

     Error analysis is important in the language learning process because it allows teachers to identify students' strengths and weaknesses. It assists students in reducing errors and improving their abilities in learning the target language. Error analysis provides some benefits to both teachers and students. According to Corder (1981), error analysis assists the learner in 

determining how far he has progressed and what remains to be learned. The studies were carried out in relation to this study. Muhsin (2016) used a survey method to examine students' errors in using the simple present. The grammatical errors were analyzed and classified after the data was collected. In the use of simple present tense, there were four types of errors: 16.79 percent omission, 5.11 percent addition errors, 75.18 percent missed information errors, and 2.92 percent improper ending errors. 
Sukasme, Kantho, and Narrot (2014) investigated grammatical errors in university students' learning of English structures in different tenses. Students' data was collected using a triangulation technique. There were 87.1 percent mistakes in the past perfect tense, 74.2 percent in the past simple tense, 67.4 percent in the present perfect tense, 54.8 percent in the past continuous tense, 48.4 percent in the present simple, 41.7 percent in the future simple tense, and 32.3 percent in the present continuous tense. 
Based on the above description, that there are in four types of dominant errors, including omission, addition, missed formation, and improper ordering. 
So, the main goal of this research is to find out what errors and difficulties students have with present tenses, as well as the frequency and causes of these errors. This research is expected to be important to researchers, students, English teachers, and other people in general.


Aims and Objectives 
1. To determine the frequency of different types of errors using present tenses. 
2. To investigate the possible causes and reasons of students’ deficiencies learning of present tenses.
3. To know the teachers’ views and opinions related to students’ mistakes in present tenses.
4. To suggest remedies to solve the issues in the teaching and learning of present tenses.


Research Questions
1. What common methodologies are used to teach present tenses to students in schools and college?
2. What are the frequencies of present tenses’ mistakes made by students in their English writings?
3. What are the reasonable and acceptable causes of students’ deficiencies in present tenses?
4. What are the views of English language teachers regarding the mistakes of present tenses made by students? 


Error
An error is a noticeable departure from a native speaker's adult grammar that reflects the learner's interlanguage competence (Brown 1980:165). The percentage of a learner's competence in the target language is revealed by error. When students write in English, the majority of them have the potential to make mistakes. It is unavoidable because language learning is a natural process. Error is linked to a student's understanding of the target language. 


Procedure of Error Analysis    
The theoretical framework used in this research to analyze the errors was S.P Corder’s Error analysis procedure. The four steps to carry out the error analysis presented by Corder (1981) are as follows: 


Collection of Learners’ Errors
In the first step of error analysis process, a sample of learner’s language is collected. 


Identification of Errors
In the second step of error analysis, the errors are identified. 
Description of Errors
The third step is the description of errors. It is compulsory to make a descriptive category of the errors to classify them and to make the frequency of the errors. Dulay, Burt and Krashen (1982) presented the Surface Structure Taxonomy to describe and to classify the errors. According to this taxonomy, learners can modify target forms in four ways: omission, addition, misinformation, and misordering. 


Explanation of Errors
 The explanation of learners' errors is the fourth and final step in error analysis. Because language learning involves a complex psychological and neurological process, the explanation for the errors is considered highly speculative. 


The Classification of Errors
The surface structure taxonomy was proposed by Dulay, Burt, and Krashen in 1982 to analyze and classify the learner’s errors. The errors are divided into four categories.


Omission
The absence of an item in a well-formed sentence is described as an omission error. This error is caused by the lack of morpheme. For instance: 
 He sitting *) = He is sitting. 


Addition
The inverse of omission error is known as addition error. The appearance of an item that should not be present in a well-formed sentence is referred to as an addition error. 
she is eats banana*) = she eats banana.


Misinformation
Misinformation error occurs when a learner uses the incorrect form or morpheme of structure in a sentence. 
Edward eat a mango*) = Edward eats a mango.


Misordering
The error of misordering is defined as the incorrect placement of one or more elements in a phrase or sentence. 
Elephants have nose long*) = Elephants have long nose.


Causes of Errors
According to Richards (1974), the following are the four causes of intralingual errors made by learners: 


Overgeneralization
Overgeneralization occurs when learners apply previously learned strategies in a new situation. 
• they are live in this house
• she did not found


Ignorance of the Rule Restriction
Ignorance of rule restrictions is similar to overgeneralization in that learners are unable to produce or observe the restriction of previously used rules and structure. 
For instance: The boy whom I saw him yesterday. 




Incomplete Application of Rules
The learners fail to use the fully developed structure in incomplete application of the rules. For example, if a student uses a statement to ask a question by marking the end of the sentence then the mistake is due to incomplete applicability of the rules, e.g., “he goes to office?”  (Richards, 1974). 


False Hypothesized Concepts
False concept hypothesis is a term used to describe faulty rule learning at various levels. There is a type of interlingual error that stems from a lack of understanding of the target language's distinctions. (E.g., the use of “was” as a sign of past tense in “one day it was happened”). 

Methodology

Results and Discussion

The Result of students’ Responses

From the responses of students, the researcher found out that at Bachelor level students were still faced issues of present tenses and their correct recognition and they are still confused in the correct usage of lexical and auxiliary verbs. Tenses were taught just through translation exercise without any creative writing. Students suggested that teacher present tenses through dialogue, discussions, short story, worksheets, and audio video clips.

 

The Result of teachers’ Responses

The teachers strongly agreed with the fact that students make errors in active and passive voice of present tenses due to cramming of rules, negligence and lack of practice on their own part. Teachers also suggested that present tenses should be taught inductively without any translation.

 

The Result of Test

The number of students were counted who made errors relate to omission, addition, misinformation and misordering in using present tenses.

 

Table 1.  The Recapitulation of Error Types, Frequency of students, and its Percentage

Error’s classification	No of students	Percentage
Error of Omission	252 / 330	76.36%
Error of Misinformation	319 / 330	96.66%
Error of Addition	65 / 330	19.69%
Error of Misordering	135 / 330	40.90%

This table gives a clear description about errors. The percentage of students who made errors of omission and misinformation is higher as compared to errors of addition and misordering.

Errors Related to Present Perfect

The present perfect tense is formed by combining the present tense of have/has with the past participle. The following are examples of incorrect statements that students made regarding present perfect sentences:

·         Someone has stole my CD player. (error of misinformation)

·         Has you ever see a grizzly bear? (error of misinformation)

·         I have never try sky driving. (error of misinformation)

·         He have work hard this week at his job. (error of misinformation)

·         Bill have just buy a new house. (error of misinformation)

·         The house have been painted green for ten years. (error of misinformation)

·         The bus has broke down. (error of misinformation)

·         Susan have eaten two pieces of cake. (error of misinformation)

·         I have rode three kilometers to get to work. (error of misinformation)

 

Passive voice errors in the present indefinite and present continuous

Some examples of incorrect sentence conversions from active to passive voice:

·         A picture is drawing by me. (error of omission)

·         Is the thief catched by the police officer? (error of omission)

·         You are not been helped by them. (error of misinformation)

·         The letter not written by you. (error of omission)

·         The door open by him. (error of omission)

·         The letter is not write by you. (error of misinformation)

·         A picture is draw by me. (error of omission+ misinformation)

·         The letter did not wrote by you. (error of misinformation)

 

Errors in the present perfect continuous tense

The present perfect is made up of the present participle + the present perfect of the verb to be: The following are some examples of incorrect sentences made by students using present perfect continuous. 

·         The workers was demanding high wages for a long time. (error of misinformation and omission)

·         I running on beach for thirty minutes. (error of omission)

·         It were raining since yesterday. (error of misinformation and omission)

·         He walk in the garden since morning. (error of misinformation and omission)

·         I use this laptop for years. (error of misinformation and omission)

·         The workers demands high wages for a long time. (error of misinformation and omission)

·         The workers have demands high wages for a long time. (error of misinformation and omission)

·         Who have been sleeping in my bed? (error of misinformation)

    It can be estimated from the above errors made by students in using present tenses that most of the students put incorrect lexical and auxiliary verbs. Errors of addition and misordering were low as compared to omission and misinformation. Students were confused about the correct helping verb in simple, progressive and perfect aspects.

 

Table 2. Error Description

Following is the detailed description of some more erroneous statements that students made using present tenses:

The data of Error	Reconstruction	Basic Grammar Term Description	Surface Structure Description
Do the blue shoes are weared by them?	Are blue shoes worn by them	Auxiliary and irregular verb	misinformation
Bill have just bought a new house	Bill has just bought a new house	Subject-verb agreement	Misinformation
Does the thief catched by the police officer	Is the thief caught by the police officer	Auxiliary and irregular verb	misinformation
Did blue shoes wear by them	Are blue shoes worn by them	Auxiliary and irregular verb	misinformation
The letter did not written by you	The letter is not written by you	Auxiliary verb	misinformation
The bus has broke down	The bus has broken down	Auxiliary verb	misinformation
I have rode three kilometer to get to work	I have ridden three kilometers to get to work	Irregular verb	misinformation
It raining since yesterday	It has been raining since yesterday	Auxiliary verb	omission
The workers demanding high wages for a long time	The workers have been demanding high wages for a long time	Auxiliary verbs	omission
How long you waiting for him	How long have you been waiting for him	Auxiliary verb	omission
Bill has just buy a new house	Bill has just bought a new house	Irregular verb	misinformation
Someone have stolen my CD player	Someone has stolen by CD player	Subject-verb agreement	misinformation
The girl has learning her lessons	The girl has been learning her lessons	Auxiliary verb	omission
He has work hard this week at his job	He has worked hard this week at his job	Regular verb	misinformation
That house have been painted green for ten years	The house has been painted green for ten years	Subject-verb agreement	misinformation
Is the thief is catched by the police officer	Is the thief being caught by the police officer	Auxiliary and irregular verb	Addition + misinformation
The book does not opened by him	The book is not opened by him	Auxiliary verb	misinformation
How long you waiting for?	How long have you been waiting for?	Auxiliary verbs	omission
I have run on beach for thirty minutes.	I have been running on beach for thirty minutes	Auxiliary verb + present participle	Omission + misinformation
Who sleeping in my bed?	Who has been sleeping in my bed	Auxiliary verbs	omission
Her payed a lot of money	A lot of money is paid by her	Auxiliary verb	Omission + misordering
Do they wear have blue shoes	Do they wear blue shoes	Auxiliary verb	addition
He working in the garden since morning.	He has been working in the garden since morning	Auxiliary verbs	omission
A letter did not written by you	A letter is not written by you	Auxiliary verb	Misinformation
The book did not opened by him	The book is not opened by him	Auxiliary verb	Misinformation
How long you waiting for	How long have you been waiting for	Auxiliary verb	Misinformation
Do not opened the book by him	The book is not opened by him	Auxiliary verb	Misinformation + misordering
Catching the thief is the police officer	Is the thief caught by the police officer	Auxiliary and lexical verbs	Misinformation + misordering
Write the letter doesn’t you	The letter is not written by you	Auxiliary and lexical verbs	Misinformation + misordering
Wear the blue shoes by them?	Are blue shoes worn by them	Auxiliary and lexical verbs	Misinformation and omission
You was not helped by them	You are not helped by them	Auxiliary verb	misinformation
Someone has stole my CD player	Someone has stolen my CD player	Irregular verb	misinformation
Someone have stolen my CD player	Someone has stolen my CD player	Subject- verb agreement	misinformation
Bill have just buy a new house	Bill has just bought a new house	Subject- verb agreement	misinformation
The house has be painted green for ten years	The house has been painted for ten years	Auxiliary verb	misinformation
The bus has broke.	The bus has broken...	Irregular verb	misinformation
The bus have broke down	The bus has broken down	Subject- verb agreement + lexical verb	misinformation
Susan has ate two pieces of cake.	Susan has eaten two pieces of cake	Irregular verb	misinformation
Susan have ate.	Susan has eaten	Subject- verb agreement + lexical verb	misinformation
Susan have eaten two pieces of cake	Susan has eaten two pieces of cake	Subject-verb agreement	misinformation
We have sail on the…	We have sailed on the.	Regular verb	Misinformation
We has sailed on the.	We have sailed on the.	Subject-verb agreement	misinformation
We has sail on the Glenmore reservoir.	We have sailed on the Glenmore reservoir	Subject- verb agreement + lexical verb	misinformation

 

The researcher's goal was to gather general information about the difficulties that students face when learning and writing in the present tense.

Although students learn present tenses and teachers teach them from primary to intermediate, it was clear from the majority of teacher responses that students do not have command of the present tenses and make grammatical errors in their writings. The errors of students were analyzed using Krashen's Surface structure taxonomy (1982), and statistical analysis showed that the greater percentage of errors was related to errors of omission and misinformation. Students made less addition and misordering mistakes. Auxiliary verbs, past participles, present participles, pronouns, subjects, subject-verb agreement, and other omissions and misinformation were discovered.

Students, according to teachers, cram the rules of present tenses, which are primarily taught to them through the grammar translation method in school and college. Most of the time, students find it difficult to change from active to passive voice in the present tense. Teachers agreed that students are not properly taught the use and function of present tenses, particularly in public schools and colleges compared to private schools and colleges. Teachers agreed that the translation method hindered students' writing skills and did not prepare them for written and spoken communication skills, resulting in students' inability to construct correct grammatical sentences. Teachers must favor teaching present tenses inductively rather than through translation so that students could gain a better understanding of the rules and structure of English.

Teachers should use different activities rather than textbooks to improve students' writing skills, such as worksheets, and should encourage students to participate in English speeches and extracurricular activities related to the English language. Teachers should experiment with new and interesting ways to teach tenses (for example, through real-life examples, charts, activities, assignments, picture descriptions, tests, and presentations), as well as allowing students to improve their creative skills.

After the calculations of errors in present tenses it can be observed that students fail to use the fully developed structure and that is why they did not apply the correct rules related to auxiliary and lexical verbs and made errors of omission and misinformation. Students had the knowledge of the rules but could not understand the rules completely. Usually when learners do not understand the exception to the general rule; are bound to commit errors. They ignored the rules related to correct grammatical sentences.

The present tenses were not well understood by the students. As a result, when they were asked to identify the tenses, they revealed their incorrect present-tense concepts and made incorrect identifications. The concepts of present perfect continuous and present continuous were mixed up. It's possible that they didn't understand the present tenses because their teachers didn't explain it to them or didn't understand it themselves. Such errors cannot be overlooked at the college level.

Conclusion

The purpose of this study was to provide information about the difficulties that students face when learning present tenses, as well as to make recommendations for avoiding common mistakes and errors that arise during the teaching and learning process. A good language teacher is one who can recognize the problems that students are having and offer solutions to help them solve them. Errors will always be made, according to Brighton (1994) (cited in Cakir, 2011), and have direct implications for corrective work because they are by their very nature systematic violations of the language's standard rules. 

The study discovered that the most common omission and misinformation errors occurred when sentences were converted from active to passive voice. 76% students made errors of omission, 96 % students made errors of misinformation, only 19% students committed errors of addition and 40% students made errors of misordering in using auxiliary verbs. The students found the task of identifying the tense name and indicating whether it was in active or passive voice to be the most difficult. It was discovered that students, even at the BS level, do not have a strong grasp of the present tense. When discussing student errors, the possible causes were also discussed. They have never been able to grasp the structure of present tenses properly, and instead of understanding the proper meaning of a sentence, they simply identify it by noticing the auxiliary and lexical verbs and make errors. 

Recommendations

• To reduce students' present-tense errors, the researcher recommends that teachers use a direct or indirect method to correct their errors. 

• English language teachers should teach not only the form but also the function of grammar, particularly tenses. As a result, the teacher should provide enough drills to the students that emphasize both the form and the use of tense. It means that the student should be able to apply or use tense in communication after learning it. Writing a short composition is one type of drill that has been suggested. Teachers should contribute more to problematic areas. 

• In addition, teachers must be creative when developing teaching materials. They can employ a variety of methods or approaches to teach English and solve students' problems, allowing them to better comprehend the various types of present tenses in both active and passive voice. Students should write in a creative manner, using proper grammar and tenses, and there should be more activities than those provided in textbooks. 

• Another study should be conducted to look into the difficulties that students had in using other English tenses (past and future tenses) in their English writings. 

References

• Carrasquillo, A. L., & London, C. B. (2013). Parents and schools: A source book: Routledge.
• Dornyei, Z. (2013). The Psychology of Second Language Acquisition-Oxford Applied Linguistics: Oxford University Press.
• Halliday, M. A. (1992). New ways of meaning: The challenge to applied linguistics. Thirty years of linguistic evolution, 59-95.
• Hudson, M. E., Browder, D. M., & Jimenez, B. A. (2014). Effects of a peer-delivered system of least prompts intervention and adapted science read-alouds on listening comprehension for participants with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 60-77.
• Kachru, Y. (1985). Discourse analysis, non‐native Englishes and second language acquisition research. World Englishes, 4(2), 223-232.
• Kirkpatrick, A. (2007). World Englishes Hardback with Audio CD: Implications for International Communication and English Language Teaching: Cambridge University Press.
• Mahboob, A. (2009). English as an Islamic language: A case study of Pakistani English. World Englishes, 28(2), 175-189.
• Nunan, D. (1987). Communicative language teaching: Making it work. ELT journal, 41(2), 136-145.
• Pun, M. (2013). The use of multimedia technology in English language teaching: A global perspective. Crossing the border: International journal of interdisciplinary studies, 1(1), 29-38.
• Rahman, T., & Knight, T. (1996). Language and politics in Pakistan: Oxford University Press Karachi.
• Shore, K. (2001). Success for ESL Students. Instructor, 110(6), 30-32,106.
• Simkins, T., Sisum, C., & Memon, M. (2003). School leadership in Pakistan: Exploring the headteacher's role. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(3), 275-291.