Lexical Stress and Semantic Range: A Comparative Componential Analysis of Pahari and English Words
Stress is a unique feature in any language's phonology, serving various purposes. The study explores the function of lexical stress in Pahari by presenting a contrast between English and Pahari. In English, stress changes the syntactic category of the word; unlike English, the stress in Pahari not only changes the syntactic category but manages to put the lexical item in an entirely different semantic field with a sharp contrast of meaning. Documented data is insufficient for studying stress in Pahari, as it needs more established literature. Therefore, native Pahari speakers are the participants in exploring the phenomenon. Data analysis revealed that a stress shift in Pahari alters the entire organization of the lexicon in terms of a particular word as the word becomes representative of the different semantic fields. The feature distinguishes Pahari from English and many other languages where the stress changes only the syntactic category, not the semantic field; as a result, the lexical item carries the same conceptual field. An example of the change in the semantic field in Pahari is the word "mundi". Stress on the first syllable, /mÊŠndi/, will occupy the feature of the body part where it means ‘neck’. Stress on
the second syllable /mÊŠnˈdi/ carries the feature of the remaining portion of the trunk of the chopped tree, where it means ‘tree stump’. The study presents a list of such words and their meanings through componential analysis (CA), indicating the same word with two different stress realizations stands for two different semantic fields. This prosodic feature of lexical stress in Pahari is similar the languages like Hebrew.
-
Language Comparison, Pahari, Lexical Stress, Semantic Field, Meanings, Componential Analysis
-
(1) Mahwish Ashiq
Lecturer, University of Poonch Rawalakot, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan.
(2) Shahid Hussain Mir
Lecturer, University of Kotli Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Pakistan.
(3) Sehrish Shafi
Assistant Professor, Department of English, Mirpur University of Science and Technology, Mirpur, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan.
- Abbasi, M. A., & Asif, I. (2010). Dilemma of Usage and Transmission - A Sociolinguistic Investigation of Dhundi- Pahari in Pakistan. Language in India. 10(5), http://www.languageinindia.com/may2010/pakistanpaharifinal.pdf
- Al-Zoubi, M. I. (2009). The validity of componential analysis in translating metaphor. Perspectives, 17(3), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/09076760902957181
- Anagbogu, P. N., Mbah, B. M., &Eme, C. A. (2010). Introduction to linguistics. http://125.22.54.221:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3571
- Babalola, J. (2014). Effects of intonation variants on the language of wider communication in a multi-lingual environment. International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, 1(3), 9-14.
- Crystal, D. (1987). How many words? English Today, 3(4), 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266078400003023
- Major, R. C., & Crystal, D. (1992). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. The Modern Language Journal, 76(3), 426. https://doi.org/10.2307/330198
- GarcÃa-Sánchez, I. M. (2015). Language socialization and marginalization. In The Routledge Handbook of linguistic anthropology (pp. 159-174). Routledge.
- Geeraerts, D. (2017). Lexical semantics. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics.
- Gnatkovska, O. (2014). Gender Specialization of Realization of the Category of Temporality in the Self-Definitions of Artistic Discourse. Scientific Journal of Chernivetsky University: German Philology, (720), 3-10.
- Hameed, J. Q. (2013). Evaluation of the Semantic Field Theory and Componential Analysis as Theoretical Approaches of Potential Value to Vocabulary Acquisition: with Special Reference to the Learner’s Collocational Competence. ADAB AL-BASRAH, 64. https://www.iasj.net/iasj/article/71607
- feagwazi, P. A. (2016). Componential analysis. Theories of linguistics. Nsukka: University of Nigeria Press Ltd, 154-166
- Karnai, M. K. (2007). Pahari aor Urdu: ikTaqabaliJaiza. Islamabad: National Language Authority.
- Khan, Q.A. (2013). A Preliminary Study of Pahari and its Sound System. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-Preliminary-Study-of-Pahari-and-Its-Sound-System/94f8f67d167ac5d066e94281aa4a177696b36375
- Murphy, M. L. (2010). Lexical meaning. Cambridge University Press.
- Murphy, M. L. (2011). Dirk Geeraerts, Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Pp. xix+ 341. Journal of Linguistics, 47(1), 231-236.7 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226710000447
- Nwaozuzu, G. I. (2013). The babelist theory of meaning: an inaugural lecture of the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, delivered on 28th February 2013. https://books.google.com.pk/books/about/The_Babelist_Theory_of_Meaning.html?id=dm3MAQAACAAJ&redir_esc=y
- Riemer, N. (2015). The Routledge Handbook of Semantics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315685533
- Saeed, J. I. (2015). Semantics. John Wiley & Sons
- Shalihah, M. (2015). A look at the world through a word†Shoesâ€: A componential analysis of meaning. English Language Studies, 15(1), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v15i1.408
- Widyastuti, S. (2010). COMPONENTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEANING: THEORY AND APPLICATION. Journal of English and Education. 724-735 http://staff.uny.ac.id/sites/default/files/compential%20analysis%20of%20meaning.pdf
- Chen-Chen, Y., & Jin-Zhu, L. (2016). The Functions of Componential Analysis to the Translation of Cultural Animal Images in The Classic of Mountains and Seas. Sino-US English Teaching, 13(9), 724-735. https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8072/2016.09.007
Cite this article
-
APA : Ashiq, M., Mir, S. H., & Shafi, S. (2021). Lexical Stress and Semantic Range: A Comparative Componential Analysis of Pahari and English Words. Global Language Review, VI(II), 326-339. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2021(VI-II).35
-
CHICAGO : Ashiq, Mahwish, Shahid Hussain Mir, and Sehrish Shafi. 2021. "Lexical Stress and Semantic Range: A Comparative Componential Analysis of Pahari and English Words." Global Language Review, VI (II): 326-339 doi: 10.31703/glr.2021(VI-II).35
-
HARVARD : ASHIQ, M., MIR, S. H. & SHAFI, S. 2021. Lexical Stress and Semantic Range: A Comparative Componential Analysis of Pahari and English Words. Global Language Review, VI, 326-339.
-
MHRA : Ashiq, Mahwish, Shahid Hussain Mir, and Sehrish Shafi. 2021. "Lexical Stress and Semantic Range: A Comparative Componential Analysis of Pahari and English Words." Global Language Review, VI: 326-339
-
MLA : Ashiq, Mahwish, Shahid Hussain Mir, and Sehrish Shafi. "Lexical Stress and Semantic Range: A Comparative Componential Analysis of Pahari and English Words." Global Language Review, VI.II (2021): 326-339 Print.
-
OXFORD : Ashiq, Mahwish, Mir, Shahid Hussain, and Shafi, Sehrish (2021), "Lexical Stress and Semantic Range: A Comparative Componential Analysis of Pahari and English Words", Global Language Review, VI (II), 326-339
-
TURABIAN : Ashiq, Mahwish, Shahid Hussain Mir, and Sehrish Shafi. "Lexical Stress and Semantic Range: A Comparative Componential Analysis of Pahari and English Words." Global Language Review VI, no. II (2021): 326-339. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2021(VI-II).35