http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glr.2020(V-IV).09
10.31703/glr.2020(V-IV).09
Published : Dec 2020
The Effectiveness of Formative Assessment of English Writing Skill at Intermediate Level
This study is intended to gauge the viability of the effectiveness of formative assessment on English writing skills at the Intermediate level and was delimited to sixty students of a public sector degree college in Wazirabad. This study was design-based in nature, and formative assessment was given to learners for four months. After the completion of the intervention, it was found out that when students are provided with formative assessment during their studies, this method of assessment improves their learning process. After the completion of the intervention, it was discovered that when students are furnished with developmental evaluation during their investigations, this technique for appraisal improves their learning cycle. The result depicts that when student remained under continuous assessment process, it improved their English writing skill. Teachers should also provide formative assessment not only to the students by themselves but also enable them for self-assessment for the improvement in their learning.
-
Formative Assessment, Effectiveness, Writing Skills, Intermediate Level
-
(1) Muhammad Saleem
Assistant Professor, Department of Education, Govt. Islamiya College Civil Lines, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
(2) Muhammad Iqbal
Assistant Professor, Department of Education, Division of Education, University of Education Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
(3) Naheed Akhter
Lecturer, Department of Education, Govt. Women Degree College, Sambrial, Sialkot, Punjab, Pakistan.
- Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2000). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85, 536-553.
- Bergan, J. R., Sladeczek, I. E., Schwarz, R. D., & Smith, A. N. (1991). Effects of a measurement and planning system on kindergartners' cognitive development and educational programming American Educational Research Journal, 28, 683-714.
- Black, P., & William, D. (2003). 'In praise of educational research': Formative assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 623-637.
- Black, P., & William, D.(1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in education, 5(1), 7-74.
- Bloom, B. S. (1969). Some theoretical issues relating to educational evaluation. In R. W. Taylor (Ed.), Educational evaluation: New roles, new means: The 68th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Evaluation, Part II (pp. 26-50). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Buchanan, T. (2000). The efficacy of a World-Wide Web mediated formative assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 193-200.
- Butler, R. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation; the effects of task-involving and egoinvolving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 1- 14.
- Chappuis, S., & Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Classroom assessment for learning. Educational Leadership, 60(1), 40- 43.
- Fontana, D., & Fernandes, M. (1994). Improvements in mathematics performance as a consequence of selfassessment in Portuguese primary school pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 407- 417
- Frederiksen, J. R., & White, B. J. (1997). Reflective assessment of students' research within an inquiry-based middle school science curriculum. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
- Fuch, L. S., & Fuch, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53, 199-208.
- Henly, D. C. (2003). Use of Web-based formative assessment to support student learning in a metabolism/nutrition unit. European Journal of Dental Education, 7, 116-122.
- Leung, C., & Mohan, B. (2004). Teacher formative assessment and talk in classroom contexts: Assessment as discourse and assessment of discourse. Language Testing, 21(3), 335-359
- Martinez, J. G. R., & Martinez, N. C. (1992). Re-examining repeated testing and teacher effects in a remedial mathematics course. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 356-363
- Melmer, R., Burmaster, E., & James, T. K. (2008). Attributes of effective formative assessment. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. October 7, 2008, http://www.ccsso.org/publications/details.cfm?Publicat ionID=362
- Perie, M., Marion, S., & Gong, B. (2007). The role of interim assessments in a comprehensive assessment system: A policy brief. October 1, 2008 http://www.nciea.org/publications/PolicyBriefFINAL. pdf
- Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Popham, W. J. (October 2006). Defining and enhancing formative assessment. Paper presented at the Annual Large-Scale Assessment Conference, Council of Chief State School Officers, San Francisco, CA
- Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical assessment, Research and Evaluation, 11(10). January 31, 2009 http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=11
- Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2006). Informal formative assessment and scientific inquiry: Exploring teachers' practices and student learning. Educational Assessment, 11, 205-235
- Schunk, D. H. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children's cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359-382.
- Schunk, D. H. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children's cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359-382.
- Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagne, and M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation, Volume I (pp. 39-83). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
- Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational researcher, 29(7), 4-14
- Sly, L. (1999). Practice tests as formative assessment improve student performance on computer-managed learning assessments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(3), 339-343
- Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment Crisis: The absence of assessment FOR learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758-765.
- Stiggins, R. J. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment FOR learning: A path to success in standardsbased schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4). February 1, 2009 http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/k_v87/k0512sti.htm
- Thompson, M., Paek, P., Goe, L., & Ponte, E. (2004). Study of the California formative assessment and support system for teachers: Relationship of BTSA/CFASST and student achievement. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
- Velan, G. M., Rakesh, K. K., Mark, D., & Wakefield, D. (2002). Web-based self-assessments in Pathology with Questionmark Perception.
Cite this article
-
APA : Saleem, M., Iqbal, M., & Akhter, N. (2020). The Effectiveness of Formative Assessment of English Writing Skill at Intermediate Level. Global Language Review, V(IV), 74-85. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2020(V-IV).09
-
CHICAGO : Saleem, Muhammad, Muhammad Iqbal, and Naheed Akhter. 2020. "The Effectiveness of Formative Assessment of English Writing Skill at Intermediate Level." Global Language Review, V (IV): 74-85 doi: 10.31703/glr.2020(V-IV).09
-
HARVARD : SALEEM, M., IQBAL, M. & AKHTER, N. 2020. The Effectiveness of Formative Assessment of English Writing Skill at Intermediate Level. Global Language Review, V, 74-85.
-
MHRA : Saleem, Muhammad, Muhammad Iqbal, and Naheed Akhter. 2020. "The Effectiveness of Formative Assessment of English Writing Skill at Intermediate Level." Global Language Review, V: 74-85
-
MLA : Saleem, Muhammad, Muhammad Iqbal, and Naheed Akhter. "The Effectiveness of Formative Assessment of English Writing Skill at Intermediate Level." Global Language Review, V.IV (2020): 74-85 Print.
-
OXFORD : Saleem, Muhammad, Iqbal, Muhammad, and Akhter, Naheed (2020), "The Effectiveness of Formative Assessment of English Writing Skill at Intermediate Level", Global Language Review, V (IV), 74-85
-
TURABIAN : Saleem, Muhammad, Muhammad Iqbal, and Naheed Akhter. "The Effectiveness of Formative Assessment of English Writing Skill at Intermediate Level." Global Language Review V, no. IV (2020): 74-85. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2020(V-IV).09