References

• Chusanachoti, R. (2009). EFL learning through language activities outside the classroom: A case study of English education students in Thailand. Michigan State University.
• Daflizar, D. (2020). Autonomous English Language Learning Beyond the Classroom: Indonesian Tertiary Students’ Practices and Constraints. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(10), 194–213.
• Dudeney, G., Hockly, N., & Pegrum, M. (2013). Digital literacies: Research and resources in language teaching. Pearson Education Limited.
• Gilster, P., & Glister, P. (1997). Digital literacy (p. 1). New York: Wiley Computer Pub.
• Godwin-Jones, R. (2016). Looking back and ahead: 20 years of technologies for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 5-12.
• Hannafin, M. J., & Hannafin, K. M. (2010). Cognition and student-centered, web- based learning: Issues and implications for research and theory. In Learning and instruction in the digital age (pp. 11-23). Springer, Boston, MA.
• Holec, H. (1979). Autonomy and foreign language learning.
• Hubbard, P. (2013). Making a case for learner training in technology-enhanced language learning environments. Calico Journal, 30(2), 163-178.
• Hyland, F. (2004). Learning Autonomously: Contextualising Out-of-class English Language Learning. Language Awareness, 13(3), 180–202.
• Lai, C., & Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out- of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317–335.
• Li, J., Snow, C., & White, C. (2015). Urban adolescent students and technology: access, use, and interest in learning language and literacy. Innovation in Language learning and teaching, 9(2), 143-162.
• Little, D. (1994). Learner autonomy: A theoretical construct and its practical application. Die Neueren Sprachen, 93(5), 430-442.
• Littlewood, W. (1996). “Autonomy”: An anatomy and a framework. System, 24(4), 427-435.
• Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers &Amp; Education, 82, 11–25.
• Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers &Amp; Education, 59(3), 1065–1078.
• Phillips, B. N., Turnbull, B. J., & He, F. X. (2015). Assessing readiness for self- directed learning within a non- traditional nursing cohort. Nurse Education Today, 35(3), e1–e7.
• Prior, D. D., Mazanov, J., Meacheam, D., Heaslip, G., & Hanson, J. (2016). Attitude, digital literacy and self efficacy: Flow-on effects for online learning behavior. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 91–97.
• Riddle, S. (2015). The robots are coming for your job! Why digital literacy is so important for the jobs of the future. The Conversation, 27, 1-4.
• Saadatmand, M., & Kumpulainen, K. (2012). Emerging technologies and new learning ecologies: Learners’ perceptions of learning in open and networked environments. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on networked learning. 266- 275.
• Toffoli, D., & Perrot, L. (2017). Autonomy, the online informal learning of english (OILE) and learning resource centers (LRCs): The relationships between learner autonomy, L2 proficiency, L2 autonomy and digital literacy.
• Trinder, R. (2015). Blending technology and face-to-face: Advanced students’ choices. ReCALL, 28(1), 83–102.
• Winke, P., & Goertler, S. (2008). Did we forget someone? Students' computer access and literacy for CALL. Calico Journal, 25(3), 482-509.
• Zhang, G. (2010). Technology uses in creating second language learning environments: When learners are creators. 1-95. Michigan State University.
• Zhao, X., & Chen, W. (2014). Correlation between learning motivation and learner autonomy for non-English majors. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 12(3), 374-379.
• Zhong, D. (2018). The evolution of learner autonomy in online environments: A case study in a New Zealand context.