References

• Achebe, C. (1958). Things fall apart. New York: Random House, Inc.
• Bhatt, R. (1997). Matching effects and the syntax-morphology interface: Evidence from Hindi correlatives. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 31. MIT Press.
• Butt, M., & King, T. H. (2007). Urdu in a parallel grammar development environment. Language Resources and Evaluation, 41(2), 191-207.
• Caffarel-Cayron, A., Martin, Jr, & Matthiessen, C. M. (2004). Language Typology: A Functional Perspective (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory) (First Edition). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
• Francis G. (1990). Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics, Theme in the daily press 4, 51-88.
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), 199-244.
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
• Halliday, M. A. K. & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer.
• Kim, M. (2007). A discourse based study on theme in Korean and textual meaning in translation. PhD thesis, Macquarie University, Sydney.
• Kim, M. (2007a). Using systemic functional text analysis for translator education: An illustration with a focus on the textual meaning. Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 1(2), 223-246.
• Kim, M. (2011a). A systemic functional approach to the tangled thread issues of Korean theme study. International Review of Korean Studies, 8(1), 101-137.
• Kim, M. (2011b). A study on target readers' reactions to different theme choices in English translations of a Korean short story. In Cho, E. (Ed.). Translation studies, what does it study: Linguistic, cultural and social approaches, 53-84. Seoul: Dongkuk University Press.
• Kunz, K., Teich, E., Hansen-Schirra, S., Neumann, S., & Daut, P. (2014). Caught in the middle - Language use and translation. Saarbrücken: Saarland University Press.
• O'Donnell, M. (2008). Demonstration of the UAM CorpusTool for text and image annotation. Proceedings of the ACL-08: HLT Demo Session (Companion Volume), 13-16. Association for Computational Linguistics.
• Rose, D. (2001). The western desert code: An Australian cryptogrammar. The Australian National University. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
• Schmidt, R. L. (1999). Urdu: An Essential Grammar. London: Routledge
• Steiner, E. (2002). Grammatical metaphor in translation: Some methods for corpus- based investigations. In HasselgÃ¥rd, H., Johansson, S., Behrens, B., & Fabricius- Hansen, C. (Eds.). Information structure in a cross-linguistic perspective, 213-228. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
• Ullah I. (1991). Bikharti Duniya. Lahore: Nigarshat Publications.