References

• Ahmad, M. (2014). Understanding Hypertextual Modalities Using Meaning Making Strategies. NUML Journal of Critical Inquiry. Vol 12 (1).
• Akamatsu, N. (2005). Effects of second language reading proficiency and first language orthography on second language word recognition. In V. Cook, & B. Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (pp. 238-259). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
• Al-Quran
• Altun, A. (2003). Understanding hypertext in the context of reading on the web: Language learners' experience. Current Issues in Education, 6(5).
• Ankrum, J. & Bean, R. (2007). Differentiated Reading Instruction: What and How. Reading Horizons. 48(1).
• Ariasi, N. & Mason, L. (2011). Uncovering the effect of text structure in learning from a science text: An eyetracking study. Instructional Science, 39, 581-601.
• Bender, W.N. (2012). Differentiating instruction for students with learning disabilities: New best practices for general and special educators (3rd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Crown
• Bouchard, M. (2005).Comprehension strategies for English language learners. New York: Scholastic.
• Brevik, L. M. (2019). Explicit reading strategy instruction or daily use of strategies? Studying the teaching of reading comprehension through naturalistic classroom observation in English L2. Reading and writing, 32(9), 2281-2310.
• Broek, P. v. d. & Kendeou, P. (2008). Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: The role of coactivation in confronting misconceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 335-351.
• Broek, P. v. d., Rapp, D.N. & Kendeou, P. (2005). Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39(2-3), 299-316.
• Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), Handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Chi, M.T.H. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology. (pp. 161-238). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
• Cox, S.G. (2008). Differentiated instruction in the elementary classroom. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 73(9), 52-54
• Csillag, J. (2016). Differentiated Reading Instruction: Strategies and Technology Tools to Help All Students Improve. Routledge.
• Das, J.P. (2002). A better look at intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 28-33.
• Dole, J.A. (2000). Readers, texts, and conceptual change. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 16, 99-118.
• Edwards, A., & Pula, J. (2008). In-class conferences as differentiated writing instruction: New uses for tutorials. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 72(3), 10-14
• Ehri, L. C. (2005). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings. In M. Snowling, J. & C. Hulm (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 135-154). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
• Guzzetti, B.J. (2000). Learning counter-intuitive science concepts: What have we learned from over a decade of research? Reading and Writing Quarterly, 16, 89-98.
• Hermida, D. (2009). The importance of teaching academic reading skills in first-year university courses. The International Journal of Research and Review, 3, 20-30.
• Hockett, J. (2018). Differentiation Strategies & Examples: Grades 6-12. Tennessee Departement of Education
• Huang, H. C., Chern, C. L., & Lin, C. C. (2009). EFL learners' use of online reading strategies and comprehension of texts: An exploratory study. Computers & Education, 52(1), 13-26
• Hynd, C.E. (2001). Refutational texts and the change process. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(7-8), 699-714.
• Jafari, D. & Kitabi, S. (2012). Metacognitive strategies and Reading Comprehension Enhancement in Iranian Intermediate EFL Setting. International Journal of Linguistics, 4 (3).
• Jiménez, J.E., Siegel, L., O'Shanahan, I. & Ford, L. (2009). The relative roles of IQ and cognitive processes in reading disability. Educational Psychology, 29, 27-43.
• Kendeou, P. & Broek, P. v. d. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during the reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1567-1577.
• Kendeou, P., Muis, K.R. & Fulton, S. (2011). Reader and text factors in reading comprehension processes. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(4), 365-383.
• Mason, L., Gava, M. & Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 291-309
• McLaughlin, M. & Allen, M. (2002). From Guided Comprehension: A Teaching Model for Grades 3-8. International Reading Association
• Moreillon, J. (2007). Collaborative strategies for teaching reading comprehension: Maximizing your impact. Chicago: American Library Association
• Nasab, M. & Motlagh, S. (2015). A Complete Review for Metacognitive, Cognitive, and Social/Affective Strategies as Essential Components of Learning strategies and their relationships with EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension Promotion. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(3).
• Nezami, S. (2012). A Critical Study of Comprehension Strategies and General Problems in Reading Skill Faced by Arab EFL Learners with Special Reference to Najran University in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Social Science & Education, 2(3).
• Nordin, N. M., Rashid, S. M., Zubir, S. I. S. S., & Sadjirin, R. (2013). Differences in reading strategies: How ESL learners really read. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 468-477.
• Oslon, C. & Land, R. (2007). A Cognitive Strategies Approach to Reading and Writing Instruction for English Language Learners in Secondary School. Research in the Teaching of English, 41(3).
• Ouellette, G. (2006). What's meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3):554-566.
• Pressley, M. (2004). The need for research on secondary literacy education. In T. L. Jetton & J. A. Dole (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research and practice(pp. 415-432). New York: Guilford
• Ratna, A. (2014).The Use of Cognitive Reading Strategies to Enhance EFL Students' Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Education, 2(1).
• Ricketts, J. Nation, K. & Bishop, DVM. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some, but not all reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(3):235-257.
• Sattar, S., & Salehi, H. (2014). The role of teaching reading strategies in enhancing reading comprehension. International Journal of Current Life Sciences, 4(11), 10922-10928.
• Syatriana, E. (2012). Developing the students' reading comprehension through cognitive reading strategies of the first-year students of SMAN 16 MAKASSAR (Master's thesis).
• Tippett, C.D. (2010). Refutation text in science education: A review of two decades of research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 951-970.
• Tomlinson, C.A., & Allan, S.D. (2000). Leadership for differentiating schools & classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
• Watkins, P. (2019). Successful Reading Practices in the Young Learners Classroom. World of Better Language.
• Westwood, P. (2001). Reading and learning difficulties: Approaches to teaching and assessment. London: David Fulton Publishers.
• Wise JC, Sevcik RA, Morris RD, Lovett MW, Wolf M. (2007). The relationship among receptive and expressive vocabulary, listening comprehension, pre-reading skills, word identification skills, and reading comprehension by children with reading disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 1093-1109.
• Wu, E.H. (2013). The path leading to differentiation: An interview with Carol Tomlinson. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24(2), 125-133.
• Yamashita, J. (2013). Word recognition subcomponents and passage level reading in a foreign language. Reading in a Foreign Language, 25(1).
• Zeynali, S., Zeynali, S., Motlagh, S. (2015). The Effects of Socio-Affective Strategy in the Enhancement of Reading Comprehension among Iranian EFL Learners. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 4(2-1).
• Zhang, X. & Guo, L. (2019). Cognitive and Metacognitive Reading Strategies Training in EFL Reading. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 428, 110-114.