THE IMPACT OF EXPLICIT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON LEARNING ENGLISH CONDITIONAL SENTENCES

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glr.2022(VII-III).11      10.31703/glr.2022(VII-III).11      Published : Sep 2022
Authored by : Khalid Shah , Ghani Rahman , Arif Khan

11 Pages : 120-132

References

  • Abrar, M., Mukminin, A., Habibi, A., Asyrafi, F., Makmur, M., & Marzulina, L. (2018). “If our English isn’t a language, what is it?” Indonesian EFL Student Teachers’ Challenges Speaking English. The Qualitative Report, 23(1), 129–145.
  • Ai, H. (2017). Providing graduated corrective feedback in an intelligent computer- assisted language learning environment. ReCALL, 29(3), 313–334.
  • Ataman, D.S., & Mirici, H. (2017). Contribution of corrective feedback to English language learners' writing skills development through workfolio based tasks. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 9(1), 1-30.
  • Banaruee, H., Khoshsima, H., & Askari, A. (2017). Corrective Feedback and Personality Type: A Case Study of Iranian L2 Learners. Global Journal of Educational Studies, 3(2), 14.
  • Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102–118
  • Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month Investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193–214.
  • Bonilla López, M., Van Steendam, E., & Buyse, K. (2017). Comprehensive corrective feedback on low and high proficiency writers. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168(1), 91– 128.
  • Briggs, J. G., Dearden, J., & Macaro, E. (2018). English medium instruction: Comparing teacher beliefs in secondary and tertiary education. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(3), 673–696.
  • Dabaghi, A. (2008). A Comparison of the Effects of Implicit and Explicit Corrective Feedback on Learners` Performance in Tailor-Made Tests. Journal of Applied Sciences, 8(1), 1–13.
  • Delacre, M., Lakens, D., & Leys, C. (2017). Why Psychologists Should by Default Use Welch’s t-test Instead of Student’s t-test. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 92.
  • Ekanayaka, W. I., & Ellis, R. (2020). Does asking learners to revise add to the effect of written corrective feedback on L2 acquisition? System, 94, 102341.
  • Ekiert, M., & di Gennaro, K. (2019). Focused written corrective feedback and linguistic target mastery: Conceptual replication of Bitchener and Knoch (2010). Language Teaching, 54(1), 71–89.
  • Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and Explicit Corrective Feedback and the Acquisition of L2 Grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(02).
  • Eskandari, M., & Soleimani, H. (2016). The Effect of Collaborative Discovery Learning Using MOODLE on the Learning of Conditional Sentences by Iranian EFL Learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(1), 153.
  • Farooq, M. S., Uzair-Ul-Hassan, M., & Wahid, S. (2012). Opinion of Second Language Learners about Writing Difficulties in the English Language. South Asian Studies a Research Journal of South Asian Studies, 27(1), 183–194.
  • Farrell, T. S. C. (2011). Exploring the professional role identities of experienced ESL teachers through reflective practice. System, 39(1), 54–62.
  • Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2014). Conducting Research with Quasi- Experiments: A Guide for Marketers. SSRN Electronic Journal, 39(1), 65–77.
  • Granena, G., Yilmaz, Y., & Leow, R. (2019). Language aptitude profiles and the effectiveness of implicit and explicit corrective feedback. The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Research in Classroom Learning, 6(4), 438-451.
  • Guo, Q., & Barrot, J. S. (2019). Effects of Metalinguistic Explanation and Direct Correction on EFL Learners’ Linguistic Accuracy. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 35(3), 261–276.
  • Ha, X. V., Murray, J. C., & Riazi, A. M. (2021). High school EFL students’ beliefs about oral corrective feedback: The role of gender, motivation and extraversion. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 235–264.
  • Han, Y. (2017). Mediating and being mediated: Learner beliefs and learner engagement with written corrective feedback. The system, 69(2), 133–142.
  • Haza’ Al Rdaat, S., & Gardner, S. (2017). An Analysis of Use of conditional Sentences by Arab Students of English. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(2), 1– 13.
  • Hery, Y. (2017). Teachers and students perceptions of communicative competence in English as a foreign language in Indonesia. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(17), 867–883.
  • Karim, K., & Nassaji, H. (2019). The effects of written corrective feedback. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 3(1), 28– 52.
  • Kim, H. R., & Bowles, M. (2019). How Deeply Do Second Language Learners Process Written Corrective Feedback? Insights Gained From Think-Alouds. TESOL Quarterly, 53(4), 913–938.
  • Kim, Y., Choi, B., Kang, S., Kim, B., & Yun, H. (2020). Comparing the effects of direct and indirect synchronous written corrective feedback: Learning outcomes and students’ perceptions. Foreign Language Annals, 53(1), 176–199.
  • Kyriakides, L., Christoforidou, M., Panayiotou, A., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2017). The impact of a three-year teacher professional development course on quality of teaching: strengths and limitations of the dynamic approach. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 465–486.
  • Lee, I. (2019). Teacher written corrective feedback: Less is more. Language Teaching, 52(4), 1–13.
  • Li, S. (2010). The Effectiveness of Corrective Feedback in SLA: A Meta-Analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365.
  • Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2012). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–40.
  • Marzban, A., & Arabahmadi, S. (2013). The Effect of Written Corrective Feedback on Iranian EFL Students’ Writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 1000–1005.
  • Paradis, E., Brien, B. O., Nimmon, L., Bandiera, G., & Martimianakis, M. A. (Tina). (2016). Design: Selection of Data Collection Methods. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 8(2), 263–264. NCBI.
  • Roitman, H., Erera, S., & Weiner, B. (2017). Robust Standard Deviation Estimation for Query Performance Prediction. Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval, 9(13), 245–248.
  • Sadat, T., Zarifi, A., Sadat, A., & Malekzadeh, J. (2015). Effectiveness of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback on Iranian EFL Learners’ Accuracy and Retention of Conditional Sentences Types I, II & III. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(10), 2023.
  • Sato, M., & Loewen, S. (2018). Metacognitive Instruction Enhances the Effectiveness of Corrective Feedback: Variable Effects of Feedback Types and Linguistic Targets. Language Learning, 68(2), 507– 545.
  • Savage, K.L., Bitterlin, G., & Price, D. (2010). Grammar Matters. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schulz, K. (2014). Fake Tense in conditional sentences: a modal approach. Natural Language Semantics, 22(2), 117–144.
  • Shamiri, H., & Farvardin, M. T. (2016). The Effect of Implicit versus Explicit Corrective Feedback on Intermediate EFL Learners’ Speaking Self-efficacy Beliefs. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(5), 1066.
  • Sheen, Y. (2011). Corrective feedback, individual differences and second language learning. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Shintani, N., & Aubrey, S. (2016). The Effectiveness of Synchronous and Asynchronous Written Corrective Feedback on Grammatical Accuracy in a Computer-Mediated Environment. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 296– 319.
  • Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2013). The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 286–306.
  • Soave, D., & Sun, L. (2017). A generalized Levene’s scale test for variance heterogeneity in the presence of sample correlation and group uncertainty. Biometrics, 73(3), 960–971.
  • Storch, N. (2018). Written corrective feedback from sociocultural theoretical perspectives: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 51(02), 262–277.
  • Tavakoli, M., & Zarrinabadi, N. (2016). Differential effects of explicit and implicit corrective feedback on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 247–259.
  • Thompson, A. A., & Renandya, W. A. (2020). Use of Gesture for Correcting Pronunciation Errors. TEFLIN Journal - a Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 31(2), 342.
  • Traugott, E., Meulen, A., Reilly, J. and Ferguson, C. (1986). On conditionals. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
  • Tsao, J.-J., Tseng, W.-T., & Wang, C. (2017). The Effects of Writing Anxiety and Motivation on EFL College Students’ Self-Evaluative Judgments of Corrective Feedback. Psychological Reports, 120(2), 219–241.
  • Tyler, A. (2012). Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. Routledge.
  • Vogt, W.P., Gardner, D.C., & Haeffele, L.M. (2012). When to use what research design. Guilford Press.
  • Wahyuni, S. (2017). The Effect of Different Feedback on Writing Quality of College Students with Different Cognitive Styles. Dinamika Ilmu, 17(1).
  • Walser, T. (2014). Quasi-experiments in schools: The case for historical cohort control groups. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 19(1), 66-79.
  • Yilmaz, Y., & Granena, G. (2019). Cognitive Individual Differences as Predictors of Improvement and Awareness under Implicit and Explicit Feedback Conditions. The Modern Language Journal, 103(3), 686–702.
  • Yüksel, D., Soruç, A., & McKinley, J. (2021). Teachers’ beliefs and practices about oral corrective feedback in university EFL classes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 103(3), 534–546.
  • Zabihi, R., & Erfanitabar, D. (2021). The Revision Effects of Varying Degrees of Written Corrective Feedback Explicitness on L2 Learners’ Writings. RELC Journal, 003368822110546.
  • Zhang, B. (2005). A Study of the acquisition of English if-conditional sentences by Chinese Learners. [Master’s Thesis, PLA University].
  • Zhao, Y., & Ellis, R. (2020). The relative effects of implicit and explicit corrective feedback on the acquisition of 3rd person -s by Chinese university students: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research, 13(6), 168–290.
  • Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 37(5), 13– 24.
  • Zohrabi, M., & Behboudnia, N. (2017). The effect of explicit and implicit corrective feedback on segmental word-level pronunciation errors. Applied Research on English Language, 6(2), 237-266.

Cite this article

APA

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Shah, Khalid, Ghani Rahman, and Arif Khan. 2022. "The Impact of Explicit Corrective Feedback on Learning English Conditional Sentences." Global Language Review, VII (III): 120-132 doi: 10.31703/glr.2022(VII-III).11

HARVARD

    HARVARD : SHAH, K., RAHMAN, G. & KHAN, A. 2022. The Impact of Explicit Corrective Feedback on Learning English Conditional Sentences. Global Language Review, VII, 120-132.

MHRA

    MHRA : Shah, Khalid, Ghani Rahman, and Arif Khan. 2022. "The Impact of Explicit Corrective Feedback on Learning English Conditional Sentences." Global Language Review, VII: 120-132

MLA

    MLA : Shah, Khalid, Ghani Rahman, and Arif Khan. "The Impact of Explicit Corrective Feedback on Learning English Conditional Sentences." Global Language Review, VII.III (2022): 120-132 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Shah, Khalid, Rahman, Ghani, and Khan, Arif (2022), "The Impact of Explicit Corrective Feedback on Learning English Conditional Sentences", Global Language Review, VII (III), 120-132

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Shah, Khalid, Ghani Rahman, and Arif Khan. "The Impact of Explicit Corrective Feedback on Learning English Conditional Sentences." Global Language Review VII, no. III (2022): 120-132. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2022(VII-III).11